Systematic diagnostic approach to proximal-without-distal claudication in a vascular population

Abstract 

Background

Very few observations of proximal-without-distal claudication have been reported in the literature. This is likely due to the use of questionnaires limiting vascular claudication to the calves and to the problems encountered in attributing unexplained “buttock” claudication to a vascular origin.

Methods

During a 2 1/2-year period, we searched for proximal-without-distal exercise-related pain with the San Diego claudication questionnaire among some 2000 patients referred for lower limb arterial investigations. Of these patients, 97 presented no contraindication to treadmill testing and were investigated with exercise transcutaneous oxygen pressure (tcpO2). We used buttock tcpO2 (DROP index<−15 mm hg) to argue for the presence of ischemia on the corresponding side.

Results

Ischemia consistent with symptoms was found in 61 patients, whereas pain on one or both sides without underlying ischemia was found in 36 patients, suggesting a non-arterial origin of the symptoms. More than half of the patients with proximal-without-distal claudication and underlying exercise-related ischemia had been suffering for more than 2 years before they were referred to the laboratory. Eleven of the patients were treated. The treatment was successful in all but one of them.

Conclusions

An important delay before diagnosis is frequently observed in proximal-without-distal claudication. TcpO2 is useful in attributing proximal exercise-related pain to a vascular origin. Given the number of detected and successfully treated patients in this small monocentric study, it is surprising that so few observations have been published to date, suggesting that proximal-without-distal arterial claudication is most likely an underestimated diagnosis.

Keywords: Intermittent claudication, Laboratory techniques and procedures, Peripheral vascular diseases, Regional blood flow, Exercise