European Journal of Internal Medicine
Volume 16, Issue 8 , Pages 561-566 , December 2005

Postmenopausal women with Colles' fracture have bone mineral density values similar to those of controls when measured with calcaneus quantitative ultrasound

  • M. Sosa

      Affiliations

    • University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical and Surgery Sciences, Hospital University Insular, Service of Internal Medicine, Bone Metabolic Unit, Spain
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Health Sciences Centre, Department of Medical and Surgery Sciences, Bone Metabolic Unit, Box 550, 35080 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Canary Islands, Spain. Tel.: +34 928451456; fax: +34 928451428.
  • ,
  • P. Saavedra

      Affiliations

    • University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Department of Mathematics, Spain
  • ,
  • C. Gómez-Alonso
  • ,
  • J. Mosquera
  • ,
  • A. Torrijos
  • ,
  • M. Muñoz-Torres
  • ,
  • C. Valero Díaz de la Madrid
  • ,
  • M. Díaz Curiel
  • ,
  • G. Martínez Díaz Guerra
  • ,
  • R. Pérez-Cano
  • ,
  • J. Alegre
  • ,
  • J. Del Pino
  • ,
  • GIUMO Study Group

      Affiliations

    • Other members of the GIUMO Study Group. J. González-Macías, J. Olmos, J. Cannata Andía, Ana Castro Lago, G. Alonso, M.J. Moro, F. Hawkins Carranza, E. Jódar Gimeno, M.J. Gómez de Tejada, R. Pérez Temprano, B. Álvarez Lario, J.L. Alonso Valdivieso, C. Montilla, L. Corral-Goudiño, D. Hernández Hernández, J. Sarmiento Santana.

Received 11 November 2004 ,Revised 8 April 2005 ,Accepted 2 June 2005.

References 

  1. Melton LJ, Chrischilles EA, Cooper C, Lane AW, Riggs BL. How many women have osteoporosis?. J Bone Miner Res. 1992;7:1005–1010
  2. National Osteoporosis Foundation . Osteoporosis: review of the evidence for prevention and treatment and cost-effectiveness analysis. Osteoporos Int. 1998;8(Suppl 4):7–26
  3. Glüer C F.t.I.Q.U.C. Group. Quantitative ultrasound technique for the assessment of osteoporosis: expert agreement on current status. J Bone Miner Res. 1996;11:707–730
  4. He YQ, Fan B, Hans D, Li C, Wu Y, Njeh CF, et al. Assessment of a new quantitative ultrasound calcaneus measurement: precision and discrimination of hip fractures in elderly women compared with dual X-ray absorptiometry. Osteoporos Int. 2000;11:354–360
  5. Kung AWC, Luk LW, Chu LW, Tang GWK. Quantitative ultrasound and symptomatic vertebral fractures in Chinese women. Osteoporos Int. 1999;10:456–461
  6. Gonelli S, Cepollaro C, Agnusdei D, Palmieri R, Rossi S, Gennari C. Diagnostic value of ultrasound analysis and bone densitometry as predictors of vertebral deformity in postmenopausal women. Osteoporos Int. 1995;5:413–418
  7. Pluijm SMF, Graafmans WC, Bouter LM, Lips P. Ultrasound measurements for the prediction of osteoporotic fractures in elderly people. Osteoporos Int. 1999;9:550–556
  8. López-Rodríguez P, Mezquita-Raya P, de Dios Luna J, Escobar-Jiménez F, Muñoz-Torres M. Performance of quantitative ultrasound in the discrimination of prevalent osteoporotic fractures in a bone metabolic unit. Bone. 2003;32:571–578
  9. Graafman WC, Bouter LM, Lips P. The influence of physical activity and fractures on ultrasound parameters in elderly people. Osteoporos Int. 1998;8:449–454
  10. Gregg EW, Kriska AM, Salamone LM, Roberts MM, Anderson SJ, Ferrell RE, et al. The epidemiology of quantitative ultrasound: a review of the relationships with bone mass, osteoporosis and fracture risk. Osteoporosis Int. 1997;7:89–99
  11. Thompson PW, Taylor J, Oliver R, Fisher A. Quantitative ultrasound of the heel predicts wrist and osteoporosis-related fractures in women aged 45–75 years. J Clin Densitom. 1998;1:219–225
  12. Sosa M, Saavedra P GIUMO Study Group. Quantitative ultrasound measurements are not useful to discriminate postmenopausal women with Colles' fracture from controls. J Bone Miner Res. 2003;18(supl1):S322
  13. Sosa M, Saavedra P, Muñoz-Torres M, Alegre J, Gómez C, González-Macías J, et al. Quantitative ultrasound calcaneus measurements: normative data and precision in Spanish population. Osteoporos Int. 2002;13:487–492
  14. O'Neill TW, Marsden D, Silman AJ and the European Vertebral Osteoporosis Study Group (EVOS). Differences in the characteristics of responders and non-responders in a prevalence survey of vertebral osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int. 1995;5:327–334
  15. Frost ML, Blake GM, Fogelman I. Contact quantitative ultrasound: an evaluation of precision, fracture discrimination, age-related bone loss and applicability of the WHO criteria. Osteoporos Int. 1999;10:441–449
  16. Krieg MA, Cornuz J, Ruffieux C, Sandini L, Büche D, Dambacher MA, et al. Comparison of three bone ultrasounds for the discrimination of subjects with and without osteoporotic fractures among 7562 elderly women. J Bone Miner Res. 2003;18:1261–1266
  17. Knapp KM, Blake GM, Fogelman I, Doyle DV, Spector TD. Multisite quantitative ultrasound: Colles' fracture discrimination in postmenopausal women. Osteoporos Int. 2002;13:474–479
  18. Mulherin D, Williams S, Smith JA, Edwards J, Sheeran TP, Price T. Identification of risk factors for future fracture in patients following distal forearm fracture. Osteoporos Int. 2003;14:757–760
  19. Giardino R, Rotini R, Noia F, Veronesi CA, Carpi A, Nicolini A, et al. Phalangeal ultrasonography in forearm fracture discrimination. Biomed Pharmacother. 2002;56:332–338
  20. Hans D, Fuerst T, Lang T, Majumdar S, Lu Y, Genant HK, et al. How can we measure bone quality?. Bailliere's Clin Rheumatol. 1997;11:495–515

PII: S0953-6205(05)00282-7

doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2005.06.012

European Journal of Internal Medicine
Volume 16, Issue 8 , Pages 561-566 , December 2005