European Journal of Internal Medicine
Volume 18, Issue 2 , Pages 118-123, March 2007

A comparative study of an ambulatory blood pressure measuring device and a wrist blood pressure monitor with a position sensor versus a mercury sphygmomanometer

  • Şekip Altunkan

      Affiliations

    • Hypertension Division, Metropol Medical Center, Nisan Sokak, No: 7, 06400, Dikmen, Ankara, Turkey
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +90 312 479 70 33; fax: +90 312 483 16 56.
  • ,
  • Yasemin Genç

      Affiliations

    • School of Medicine, Department of Biostatistics, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey
  • ,
  • Erkan Altunkan

      Affiliations

    • Hypertension Division, Metropol Medical Center, Nisan Sokak, No: 7, 06400, Dikmen, Ankara, Turkey

Received 23 March 2006; received in revised form 21 August 2006; accepted 29 September 2006.

Abstract 

Background

Self-measurements of blood pressure (BP) and 24-hour BP measurements are better predictors of cardiovascular mortality and morbidity than office BP measurements. The objective of this study was to compare the accuracy and precision of a wrist BP monitor with a position sensor (Omron 637IT) and of an ambulatory BP measuring monitor (ABPM; Nissei DS-250) with a mercury sphygmomanometer.

Methods

A total of 139 patients (69 women and 70 men) were included in the study. The BP of each subject was first measured with a mercury device using the same (left) arm. After this, the wrist monitor was used for BP measurement. Upon completion of the BP readings, 24-hour BP monitoring was performed using Nissei DS-250 monitors. Mean and standard deviations were calculated for all devices. In order to assess the agreement between the measurement methods, the Bland–Altman method and graphics were utilized.

Results

The mean systolic BP measured by the mercury device was 133.2±18.4 mmHg and the diastolic BP was 85.4±12.5 mmHg, whereas the digital device measured systolic BP as 135.7±17.2 mmHg and diastolic BP as 87.0±12.5 mmHg. The 24-hour BP measurement was 134.6±16.6 mmHg for systolic BP and 85.6±11.1 mmHg for diastolic BP. The difference with regard to systolic BP between the mercury and the Omron devices was −2.5±5.3 mmHg, which is within the AAMI standard. However, while the mean values of the differences between the mercury and ABPM devices remained under 5 mmHg, their standard deviation was above ± 8 mmHg. For diastolic BP, the difference between all of the devices was below 5±8 mmHg.

Conclusions

The wrist BP monitor produced results consistent with those of the mercury sphygmomanometer when both were compared with the results of the ABPM. As BP measurement with these devices is a practical and repeatable method, they can be used instead of ABPM in the diagnosis and monitoring of hypertension. However, there is a need for further comparative studies.

Keywords: ABPM, Wrist monitors, Blood pressure measurement, Omron 637 IT, Nissei DS-250

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0953-6205(06)00299-8

doi:10.1016/j.ejim.2006.09.018

European Journal of Internal Medicine
Volume 18, Issue 2 , Pages 118-123, March 2007