Journal Home
Search for

Volume 19, Issue 3, Pages 187-191 (May 2008)


View previous. 8 of 22 View next.

Electrocardiographic QT interval and cardiovascular reactivity in fibromyalgia differ from chronic fatigue syndrome

Jochanan E. NaschitzaCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Gleb Slobodina, Dauod Sharifb, Madeline Fieldsa, Hillel Isseroffa, Edmond Saboa, Itzhak Rosnerc

Received 17 February 2007; received in revised form 27 August 2007; accepted 30 August 2007. published online 15 November 2007.

Abstract 

Background

Fibromyalgia (FM) and chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) frequently overlap clinically and have been considered variants of one common disorder. We have recently shown that CFS is associated with a short corrected electrocardiographic QT interval (QTc). In the present study, we evaluated whether FM and CFS can be distinguished by QTc.

Methods

The study groups were comprised of women with FM (n=30) and with CFS (n=28). The patients were evaluated with a 10 min supine–30 min head-up tilt test. The electrocardiographic QT interval was corrected for heart rate (HR) according to Fridericia's equation (QTc). In addition, cardiovascular reactivity was assessed based on blood pressure and HR changes and was expressed as the ‘hemodynamic instability score’ (HIS).

Results

The average supine QTc in FM was 417 ms (SD 25) versus 372 ms (SD 22) in CFS (p<0.0001); the supine QTc cut-off <385.7 ms was 79% sensitive and 87% specific for CFS vs. FM. The average QTc at the 10th minute of tilt was 409 ms (SD 18) in FM versus 367 ms (SD 21) in CFS (p<0.0001); the tilt QTc cut-off <383.3 ms was 71% sensitive and 91% specific for CFS vs. FM. The average HIS in FM patients was −3.52 (SD 1.96) versus +3.21 (SD 2.43) in CFS (p<0.0001).

Conclusion

A relatively short QTc and positive HIS characterize CFS patients and distinguish them from FM patients. These data may support the contention that FM and CFS are separate disorders.

a Departments of Internal Medicine A, Bnai Zion Medical Center and ‘Rappaport Family’ Faculty of Medicine, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel

b Heart Institute, Bnai Zion Medical Center and ‘Rappaport Family’ Faculty of Medicine, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel

c Rheumatology, Bnai Zion Medical Center and ‘Rappaport Family’ Faculty of Medicine, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel

Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Department of Internal Medicine A, Bnai Zion Medical Center, Haifa 31048, P.O. Box 4940, Israel.

PII: S0953-6205(07)00258-0

doi:10.1016/j.ejim.2007.08.003


View previous. 8 of 22 View next.