European Journal of Internal Medicine
Volume 20, Issue 3 , Pages 289-295, May 2009

Not all obese subjects of multiethnic origin are at similar risk for developing hypertension and type 2 diabetes

  • Virginia A. Genelhu

      Affiliations

    • Hypertension Clinic, Laboratory of Clinical and Experimental Pathophysiology, (CLINEX), School of Medicine, Rio de Janeiro State University, Brazil
  • ,
  • Bruno M.J. Celoria

      Affiliations

    • Hypertension Clinic, Laboratory of Clinical and Experimental Pathophysiology, (CLINEX), School of Medicine, Rio de Janeiro State University, Brazil
  • ,
  • Stenio Fernando Pimentel Duarte

      Affiliations

    • Hypertension Clinic, Laboratory of Clinical and Experimental Pathophysiology, (CLINEX), School of Medicine, Rio de Janeiro State University, Brazil
  • ,
  • Pedro H. Cabello

      Affiliations

    • Human Genetics Laboratory, Oswaldo Cruz Institute, Ministry of Health, Brazil
  • ,
  • Emilio A. Francischetti

      Affiliations

    • Hypertension Clinic, Laboratory of Clinical and Experimental Pathophysiology, (CLINEX), School of Medicine, Rio de Janeiro State University, Brazil
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Laboratory of Clinical and Experimental Pathophysiology — CLINEX, Rua Paulo Cesar de Andrade 106 ap. 602 — Laranjeiras, Rio de Janeiro — CEP 22221-090, Brazil. Tel.: +55 21 2587 6836; fax: +55 21 2587 6836.

Received 26 April 2008; received in revised form 26 August 2008; accepted 22 September 2008. published online 29 October 2008.

Abstract 

Backgrounds

Whether insulin resistance and not obesity per se is the major contributor to clinical outcomes associated with obesity has not been fully established. This study evaluated in a group of obese Brazilians of multiethnic origin to what extent the prevalence of hypertension and other cardiometabolic risk factors varies as a function of the degree of insulin sensitivity.

Methods

The study involved 118 individuals (mean age of 44±12 years; BMI=38.6±7.9 kg/m2) without evidence of diabetes or cardiovascular disease. Insulin resistance was assessed by HOMA-IR index, which was used to stratify patients into tertiles.

Results

The mean HOMA-IR in tertile 1, the most insulin-sensitive group, was 2.7±0.8 and in tertile 3, the most insulin-resistant group, 9.1±2.4 (P<0.001). Mean arterial pressure showed a linear and significant variation across the HOMA-IR tertiles 1, 2, and 3 (94.3±11.7; 98.7±11.4; 105.0±12.4 mm Hg), as did fasting plasma glucose (93.6±12.1; 98.1±12.7; 100.0±11.0 mg/dL), uric acid (4.7±1.4; 5.9±1.9; 6.3±1.4 mg/dL), HDL-cholesterol (48.1±11.6; 46.5±10.5; 42.2±8.0 mg/dL), and plasma adiponectin (7.8±3.3; 7.0±2.8; 6.3±6.5 µg/mL), respectively. The results indicated that 27.5% of our patients had dysglicemia, 28.2% had hypertriglyceridemia, and 30.7% had arterial hypertension in the most insulin-sensitive tertile, when compared with 51%, 53.8% and 79.4%, respectively, in the most insulin-resistant tertile. A stepwise regression analysis showed that only HOMA-IR and age independently affected the risk for increased systolic blood pressure.

Conclusion

In conclusion, our findings have shown that the risk of developing essential hypertension, type 2 diabetes, and cardiovascular disease is accentuated in obese individuals who are also more insulin resistant.

Keywords: Insulin-resistance, Multiethnic obese, Hypertension, Type 2 diabetes

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0953-6205(08)00274-4

doi:10.1016/j.ejim.2008.09.009

European Journal of Internal Medicine
Volume 20, Issue 3 , Pages 289-295, May 2009