In the recently published paper “Ethics of reviewing scientific publications” [
[1]
] the author avoids two “elephants in the room”.- Napolitani F.
- Petrini C.
- Garattini S.
Ethics of reviewing scientific publications.
Eur J Intern Med. 2016; (Published online: December 27, 2016)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejim.2016.12.011
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to European Journal of Internal MedicineAlready a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
Reference
- Ethics of reviewing scientific publications.Eur J Intern Med. 2016; (Published online: December 27, 2016)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejim.2016.12.011
Article info
Publication history
Published online: December 31, 2016
Accepted:
December 22,
2016
Received in revised form:
December 19,
2016
Received:
December 15,
2016
Identification
Copyright
© 2016 European Federation of Internal Medicine. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.