Unprovoked venous thromboembolism (VTE) is associated with a 5 to 27% annual risk
of recurrence after discontinuation of anticoagulation (AC) [
1
,
2
,
3
,
4
], and indefinite AC is recommended if the bleeding risk is low to moderate [
[5]
]. However, in one-third of patients with unprovoked VTE, the risk of recurrence is
so low (<3% per year) that anticoagulant therapy >3–6 months may not be necessary [
4
,
6
]. Several prediction rules were derived to identify patients with unprovoked VTE who
have a low recurrence risk [
4
,
7
,
8
]. In 2016 in this journal, we published our results of the original DAMOVES score,
which was derived in 398 patients with a first unprovoked VTE. Based on 7 parameters:
age, sex, body mass index (BMI), D-dimer level during AC, factor VIII coagulant activity,
genetic thrombophilia and varicose veins, we developed a nomogram for prediction of
recurrence in an individual patient with unprovoked VTE [
[9]
]. We aimed to validate this nomogram in patients with unprovoked VTE. A retrospective
review was performed on a cohort of patients with unprovoked symptomatic deep vein
thrombosis or pulmonary embolism from department of Internal Medicine of Torrejón
University Hospital in Madrid, Spain, between August 2012 and October 2015. For the
sake of this analysis, only patients with unprovoked VTE and who had completed at
least 3 months AC were included. We determined the proportion of patients classified as low-
vs higher-risk of VTE recurrence according to DAMOVES score (for this purpose, based
on a consensus that an annual VTE recurrence rate below 5% was an acceptable risk;
according to the nomogram, a score <11.5 points was considered a low recurrence risk). The Receiver Operating Characteristic
(AUC) reflects the ability of the model to discriminate between patients with low-
vs higher-risk of VTE recurrence. Stata 14.0 was used for the statistical analyses.
In all statistical analyses, a P-value <0.05 was considered significant. A total of 121 patients with unprovoked VTE were
included for the analysis. The median follow-up was 18 months after discontinuation the AC therapy. The proportion of VTE recurrence was
6,61% (8/121). In all patients, VTE recurred spontaneously. When applying, the cut-off
point from the nomogram, 35 (28.92%) out of 121 subjects were categorized as having
a low-risk of recurrent VTE, and 86 (71.07%) as having a high-risk. Table 1 shows the baseline characteristics of development and validation cohorts. Within
these two categories, the observed prevalence of recurrent VTE was 2.85% (1 out of
35 subjects) in the low-risk category, and 20% (7 out of 86) in the high-risk category.
The AUC of the nomogram in the external validation cohort was 0.83 ([95% confidence
interval, 0.743–0.810], P-value <0.001). The model showed good calibration. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test showed consistent
results (P-value = 0.125). In conclusions, DAMOVES score may be suitable for identifying patients with
unprovoked VTE who are at low risk of VTE recurrence. Further studies should attempt
to develop a prediction model or to update the DAMOVES nomogram.
Table 1Comparison of baselines characteristics in the development and validation cohorts.
Original (n = 398) | External validation | P-value | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
All (n = 121) | Low-risk patients (n = 35) | Higher-risk patients (n = 86) | |||
n (%) or median (interquartile range) | |||||
Age (years) | 1.04 (1.01; 1.07) | 72.0 (69.0; 79.8) | 69.0 (62.0; 77.0) | 78.0 (69.0; 81.0) | 0.04 |
Male sex | 2.89 (1.21; 6.90) | 81.0 (66.94) | 12.0 (34.28) | 69.0 (80.23) | <0.01 |
Obesity (BMI ≥30 kg/m2) | 3.92 (1.75; 8.75) | 78.0 (64.46) | 8.0 (22.85) | 70.0 (81.39) | <0.01 |
Elevated D-dimer levels during AC | 13.66 (4.74; 39.37) | 69.0 (57.02) | 5.0 (14.28) | 64.0 (74.41) | <0.01 |
Factor VIII coagulant activity | 1.01 (1.00; 1.02) | 128.0 (96; 181) | 135.0 (96; 151) | 171.0 (124; 181) | <0.01 |
Genetic thrombophilia | 13.86 (5.87; 32.75) | 66.0 (54.54) | 13.0 (37.14) | 53.0 (61.62) | <0.01 |
Varicose veins | 4.14 (1.81; 9.43) | 40.0 (33.05) | 11.0 (31.42) | 29.0 (33.72) | 0.20 |
a Genetic thrombophilia: heterozygous of factor V Leiden and/or Prothrombin G20210A
mutation.
Keywords
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to European Journal of Internal MedicineAlready a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
References
- A comparison of three months of anticoagulation with extended anticoagulation for a first episode of idiopathic venous thromboembolism.N Engl J Med. 1999; 340: 901-907
- Three months versus one year of oral anticoagulant therapy for idiopathic deep venous thrombosis.N Engl J Med. 2001; 345: 165-169
- The risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism after discontinuing anticoagulation in patients with acute proximal deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism. A prospective cohort study in 1,626 patients.Haematologica. 2007; 92: 199-205
- Identifying unprovoked thromboembolism patients at low risk for recurrence who can discontinue anticoagulant therapy.CMAJ. 2008; 179: 417-426
- Antithrombotic therapy for VTE disease: CHEST guideline and expert panel report.Chest. 2016 Feb; 149: 315-352
- D-dimer levels and risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism.JAMA. 2003; 290: 1071-1074
- Predicting disease recurrence in patients with previous unprovoked venous thromboembolism: a proposed prediction score (DASH).J Thromb Haemost. 2012; 10: 1019-1025
- Risk assessment of recurrence in patients with unprovoked deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism: the Vienna prediction model.Circulation. 2010; 121: 1630-1636
- A risk score for prediction of recurrence in patients with unprovoked venous thromboembolism (DAMOVES).Eur J Intern Med. 2016 Apr; 29: 59-64
Article info
Publication history
Published online: April 06, 2017
Accepted:
March 29,
2017
Received:
March 27,
2017
Identification
Copyright
© 2017 European Federation of Internal Medicine. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.