Advertisement

Are there ways to improve the citations of a scientific paper?

Published:February 03, 2018DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejim.2017.12.006

      Highlights

      • Retrieval of useful scientific information leaves many important data unrecognized.
      • Redundant information from generic KWs discourages searching and citation.
      • A rational KW choice narrows the target, optimizing scientific information exchange.
      • Selecting focused KWs improves diffusion-citation of relevant scientific knowledge.
      • Suitable formulas to trial and error reshape KWs optimize the chances of citation.

      Abstract

      Background

      The expansion of scientific publications makes more difficult the mining of relevant information necessary for a productive appraisal of authors' work, scientific interaction and exchange. Papers over-citation is unproductive, under-citation of innovative research generates delay and inefficiency. The extraction of information from the literature is mostly based on keywords (KWs).

      Methods

      I computed the chances of citation of one paper as 1/number of papers retrieved by the KWs published in that paper, and compared them with the chances obtained by selecting different KWs.

      Results

      Using generic KWs the chances are smaller, at times practically nil, as compared to those calculated with more specific KWs and their association.

      Conclusions

      Selecting scientifically-analyzed KWs, specific for the message conveyed by a paper and computing beforehand the theoretical chances of citation, might increase the citations obtained, the retrieval of important scientific and innovative information, optimize scientific exchange and qualitative productivity.

      Learning points

      • Retrieval of useful scientific information leaves many important data unrecognized when the KWs selected display a large number of papers.
      • Redundant information yielded by generic KWs discourages searching and favors the citation of articles published on established and well reputed journals.
      • A more rational use of KWs narrows the target, offering more selected information, while optimizing the exchange of scientific data and hypothesis.
      • Appropriately selected KWs might improve the access to, and the diffusion-citation of relevant scientific knowledge.
      • Trial and error reshaping of KWs allows their best selection to improve the chances of citation, that can be computed by appropriate formulas.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to European Journal of Internal Medicine
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Whittaker J.
        Creativity and conformity in science: titles, keywords and co-word analysis.
        Soc Stud Sci. 1989; 19: 473-496
        • Müller H.-M.
        • Kenny E.E.
        • Sternberg P.W.
        Textpresso: an ontology-based information retrieval and extraction system for biological literature.
        PLoS Biol. 2004; 2e309https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0020309
        • Bonciu C.
        Title, abstract and keywords: essential issues in medical bibliographic research.
        Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi. 2005; 109: 916-926
        • Shah P.K.
        • Perez-Iratxeta C.
        • Bork P.
        • Andrade M.A.
        Information extraction from full text scientific articles: where are the keywords?.
        BMC Bioinf. 2003; 4: 20
        • Garfield E.
        The history and meaning of the journal impact factor.
        JAMA. 2006; 295: 90-93
        • Larsen P.O.
        • von Ins M.
        The rate of growth in scientific publication and the decline in coverage provided by Science Citation Index.
        Forensic Sci. 2010; 84: 575-603
        • Bollacker K.D.
        • Lawrence S.
        • Giles C.L.
        CiteSeer: an autonomous Web agent for automatic retrieval and identification of interesting publications.
        in: Proceeding AGENTS '98 Proceedings of the second international conference on Autonomous agents 1998; 116–123. Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA — May 10–13, 1998. ACM New York, NY, USA1998 (Table of contents ISBN:0-89791-983-1)
        • Salton G.
        The state of retrieval system evaluation.
        Inf Process Manag. 1992; 28: 441-449
        • Seglen P.O.
        How representative is the journal impact factor?.
        Research Evaluation. 1992; 2: 143-149

      Linked Article

      • How to win space in medical journals: Bits and tips
        European Journal of Internal MedicineVol. 50
        • Preview
          I chose to convey to the readership a few words not only on the achievements of the European Journal of Internal Medicine and the strategies implemented by me and the other editors for the disposal of the submitted articles, but also a few pieces of advice to prospective contributors, particularly those who are more junior and thus less experienced.
        • Full-Text
        • PDF