I chose to convey to the readership a few words not only on the achievements of the
European Journal of Internal Medicine and the strategies implemented by me and the
other editors for the disposal of the submitted articles, but also a few pieces of
advice to prospective contributors, particularly those who are more junior and thus
less experienced.
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to European Journal of Internal MedicineAlready a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
References
- The p-value: a clinician's disease?.Eur J Intern Med. 2016; 35: 20-23
- Are there ways to improve the citations of a scientific paper?.Eur J Intern Med. 2018; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejim.2017.12.006
Article info
Publication history
Published online: February 10, 2018
Identification
Copyright
© 2018 European Federation of Internal Medicine. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
ScienceDirect
Access this article on ScienceDirectLinked Article
- Are there ways to improve the citations of a scientific paper?European Journal of Internal MedicineVol. 50
- PreviewThe expansion of scientific publications makes more difficult the mining of relevant information necessary for a productive appraisal of authors' work, scientific interaction and exchange. Papers over-citation is unproductive, under-citation of innovative research generates delay and inefficiency. The extraction of information from the literature is mostly based on keywords (KWs).
- Full-Text
- Preview
