Intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism: Aiming to improve patient stratification


      • Most intermediate-risk PE patients with RV involvement have a benign course.
      • Severe RV dysfunction and syncope were associated with worse outcomes.
      • A combined score might stratify those patients with a more benign clinical course.



      Intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism (PE) patients present a therapeutic dilemma. While some are at risk for developing adverse events, possibly requiring escalation therapy, most will have a benign course. Our aim was to define predictors which will identify those patients who will not deteriorate despite the presence of RV involvement.


      We evaluated 179 consecutive intermediate-risk PE patients (47% males; mean age: 66 ± 16 years), allocating them to those who did and did not need escalation therapy and evaluating the predictors for deterioration. We then formulated a score to distinguish between those who would not require escalation therapy.


      Twenty-six patients (15%) required escalation therapy which was associated with significantly more episodes of syncope (42% vs. 15%, p = 0.001), higher D-Dimer levels (10,810 ± 19,147 vs. 3816 ± 6255, p < 0.001), echocardiographic evidence of severe right ventricular (RV) dysfunction (42% vs. 19%, p < 0.01), or a higher RV/left ventricular (LV) diameter ratio on computed tomography (CT) (1.9 ± 0.6 vs. 1.46 ± 0.5, p < 0.001). On multivariate analysis the presence of syncope (HR 2.8 CI 1.1–7.1) and severe RV dysfunction on echocardiography (HR 3.5 CI 1.4–9.3) were found to be independent predictors for escalation therapy. A combined score of 1 was associated with only a 1.9% risk for escalation, while a maximum score of 4 was associated with a 57% risk for escalation therapy (P for trend<0.001). Conclusions: A small but significant number of intermediate-risk PE patients required escalation therapy. A combined score comprising clinical, imaging, and laboratory parameters might aid in further risk stratification, identifying those intermediate risk PE patients with a more benign clinical course.


      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to European Journal of Internal Medicine
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Minges K.E.
        • Bikdeli B.
        • Wang Y.
        • et al.
        National trends in pulmonary embolism hospitalization rates and outcomes for adults aged ≥65 years in the United States (1999 to 2010).
        Am J Cardiol. 2015; 116: 1436-1442
        • Jiménez D.
        • de Miguel-Díez J.
        • Guijarro R.
        • et al.
        Trends in the management and outcomes of acute pulmonary embolism: analysis from the RIETE registry.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016; 67: 162-170
        • Grifoni S.
        • Olivotto I.
        • Cecchini P.
        • et al.
        Short-term clinical outcome of patients with acute pulmonary embolism, normal blood pressure, and echocardiographic right ventricular dysfunction.
        Circulation. 2000; 101: 2817-2822
        • Hamel E.
        • Pacouret G.
        • Vincentelli D.
        • et al.
        Thrombolysis or heparin therapy in massive pulmonary embolism with right ventricular dilation: results from a 128-patient monocenter registry.
        Chest. 2001; 120: 120-125
        • Sanchez O.
        • Trinquart L.
        • Colombet I.
        • et al.
        Prognostic value of right ventricular dysfunction in patients with haemodynamically stable pulmonary embolism: a systematic review.
        Eur Heart J. 2008; 29: 1569-1577
        • Becattini C.
        • Agnelli G.
        • Lankeit M.
        • et al.
        Acute pulmonary embolism: mortality prediction by the 2014 European society of cardiology risk stratification model.
        Eur Respir J. 2016; 48: 780-786
        • Barco S.
        • Vicaut E.
        • Klok F.A.
        • et al.
        Improved identification of thrombolysis candidates amongst intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism patients: implications for future trials.
        Eur Respir J. 2018; 51
        • Konstantinides S.V.
        • Torbicki A.
        • Agnelli G.
        • et al.
        ESC guidelines on the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism.
        Eur Heart J. 2014; 35 (2014. [3069a-3069k]): 3033-3069
        • Kearon C.
        • Akl E.A.
        • Ornelas J.
        • et al.
        Antithrombotic therapy for VTE disease: chest guideline and expert panel report.
        Chest. 2016; 149: 315-352
        • Bova C.
        • Sanchez O.
        • Prandoni P.
        • et al.
        Identification of intermediate-risk patients with acute symptomatic pulmonary embolism.
        Eur Respir J. 2014; 44: 694-703
        • Hobohm L.
        • Hellenkamp K.
        • Hasenfuß G.
        • Münzel T.
        • Konstantinides S.
        • Lankeit M.
        Comparison of risk assessment strategies for not-high-risk pulmonary embolism.
        Eur Respir J. 2016; 47: 1170-1178
        • Freitas P.
        • Santos A.R.
        • Ferreira A.M.
        • et al.
        Derivation and external validation of the SHIeLD score for predicting outcome in normotensive pulmonary embolism.
        Int J Cardiol. 2019 Apr 15; 281: 119-124
        • Kanter D.S.
        • Mikkola K.M.
        • Patel S.R.
        • Parker J.A.
        • Goldhaber S.Z.
        Thrombolytic therapy for pulmonary embolism. Frequency of intracranial hemorrhage and associated risk factors.
        Chest. 1997; 111: 1241-1245
        • Meyer G.
        • Vicaut E.
        • Danays T.
        • et al.
        Fibrinolysis for patients with intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism.
        N Engl J Med. 2014; 370: 1402-1411

      Linked Article

      • Patients with acute pulmonary embolism at intermediate risk for death: Can we further stratify?
        European Journal of Internal MedicineVol. 65
        • Preview
          International Scientific Societies (European Society of Cardiology, American Heart Association, American College of Chest Physician) recommend stratification for the risk of short-term death to drive acute clinical care in patients with acute pulmonary embolism (PE) [1–3]. However, no consensus exists on the optimal strategy for risk stratification beyond the classification in hemodynamically stable and unstable patients. The European Society of Cardiology (ESC) proposed a comprehensive strategy for risk stratification that includes both clinical and instrumental criteria [1].
        • Full-Text
        • PDF