Advertisement

Validity of "Sepsis-3" criteria in identifying patients with community-onset sepsis in Internal Medicine wards; a prospective, multicenter study

Published:January 12, 2021DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejim.2020.12.025

      Abstract

      Background

      Few data are available on the validity of “Sepsis-3” criteria in identifying patients with sepsis in internal medicine wards (IMWs). Real-life data about this topic and on the prevalence of sepsis in IMWs could be useful for improving hospital organization.

      Objectives

      To assess the validity of "Sepsis-3" criteria in identifying patients with community-onset sepsis in IMWs. Secondary objectives: to evaluate the prevalence of these patients in IMWs and to compare "Sepsis-3" and "Sepsis-1" criteria.

      Methods

      Multicenter, prospective, observational, cohort study, carried out in 22 IMWs of Tuscany (Italy). All patients admitted to each of the study centers over a period of 21-31 days were evaluated within 48 hours; those with clinical signs of infection were enrolled. The main outcome was in-hospital mortality.

      Results

      2,839 patients were evaluated and 938 (33%) met the inclusion criteria. Patients with sepsis diagnosed according to “Sepsis-3” were 522, representing 55.6% of patients with infection and 18.4% of all patients hospitalized; they were older than those without sepsis (79.4±12.5 vs 74.6±15.2 years, p<0.001). In-hospital mortality was significantly higher in patients with sepsis compared to others (13.8% vs 4.6%; p<0.001). “Sepsis-3” criteria showed greater predictive validity for in-hospital mortality than “Sepsis-1” criteria (AUROC=0.71; 95%CI, 0.66-0.77 vs 0.60; 95%CI 0.54-0.66; p=0.0038).

      Conclusions

      "Sepsis-3" criteria are able to identify patients with community-onset sepsis in IMWs, whose prevalence and in-hospital mortality are remarkably high. Medical departments should adapt their organization to the needs for care of these complex patients.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to European Journal of Internal Medicine
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Rudd KE
        • Johnson SC
        • Agesa KM
        • et al.
        Global, regional, and national sepsis incidence and mortality, 1990-2017: analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study.
        Lancet. 2020; 395: 200-211https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32989-7
        • Singer M
        • Deutschman CS
        • Seymour CW
        • et al.
        The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3).
        JAMA. 2016; 315: 801-810https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.0287
        • Bone RC
        • Sibbald WJ
        • Sprung CL.
        The ACCP-SCCM consensus conference on sepsis and organ failure.
        Chest. 1992; 101: 1481-1483https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.101.6.1481
        • Raith EP
        • Udy AA
        • Bailey M
        • et al.
        Prognostic Accuracy of the SOFA Score, SIRS Criteria, and qSOFA Score for In-Hospital Mortality Among Adults With Suspected Infection Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit.
        JAMA. 2017; 317: 290-300https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.20328
        • Innocenti F
        • Tozzi C
        • Donnini C
        • et al.
        SOFA score in septic patients: incremental prognostic value over age, comorbidities, and parameters of sepsis severity.
        Intern Emerg Med. 2018; 13: 405-412https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-017-1629-5
        • Abe T
        • Ogura H
        • Shiraishi A
        • et al.
        Characteristics, management, and in-hospital mortality among patients with severe sepsis in intensive care units in Japan: the FORECAST study.
        Crit Care. 2018; 22 (Published 2018 Nov 22): 322https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-018-2186-7
        • Soo A
        • Zuege DJ
        • Fick GH
        • et al.
        Describing organ dysfunction in the intensive care unit: a cohort study of 20,000 patients.
        Crit Care. 2019; 23 (Published 2019 May 23): 186https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-019-2459-9
        • Abe T
        • Yamakawa K
        • Ogura H
        • et al.
        Epidemiology of sepsis and septic shock in intensive care units between sepsis-2 and sepsis-3 populations: sepsis prognostication in intensive care unit and emergency room (SPICE-ICU).
        J Intensive Care. 2020; 8 (Published 2020 Jun 30): 44https://doi.org/10.1186/s40560-020-00465-0
        • Vincent JL
        • Moreno R
        • Takala J
        • et al.
        The SOFA (Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failure. On behalf of the Working Group on Sepsis-Related Problems of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine.
        Intensive Care Med. 1996; 22: 707-710https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01709751
        • Pandharipande PP
        • Shintani AK
        • Hagerman HE
        • et al.
        Derivation and validation of Spo2/Fio2 ratio to impute for Pao2/Fio2 ratio in the respiratory component of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score.
        Crit Care Med. 2009; 37: 1317-1321https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0b013e31819cefa9
        • Sendagire C
        • Lipnick MS
        • Kizito S
        • et al.
        Feasibility of the modified sequential organ function assessment score in a resource-constrained setting: a prospective observational study.
        BMC Anesthesiol. 2017; 17 (Published 2017 Jan 26): 12https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-017-0304-8
        • Brun-Buisson C
        • Doyon F
        • Carlet J
        • et al.
        Incidence, risk factors, and outcome of severe sepsis and septic shock in adults. A multicenter prospective study in intensive care units. French ICU Group for Severe Sepsis.
        JAMA. 1995; 274: 968-974
        • Vincent JL
        • Rello J
        • Marshall J
        • et al.
        International study of the prevalence and outcomes of infection in intensive care units.
        JAMA. 2009; 302: 2323-2329https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2009.1754
        • Esteban A
        • Frutos-Vivar F
        • Ferguson ND
        • et al.
        Sepsis incidence and outcome: contrasting the intensive care unit with the hospital ward.
        Crit Care Med. 2007; 35: 1284-1289https://doi.org/10.1097/01.CCM.0000260960.94300
        • Mazzone A
        • Dentali F
        • La Regina M
        • et al.
        Clinical Features, Short-Term Mortality, and Prognostic Risk Factors of Septic Patients Admitted to Internal Medicine Units: Results of an Italian Multicenter Prospective Study.
        Medicine (Baltimore). 2016; 95: e2124https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000002124
        • Vardi M
        • Ghanem-Zoubi NO
        • Bitterman H
        • et al.
        Sepsis in nonagenarians admitted to internal medicine departments: a comparative study of outcomes.
        QJM. 2013; 106: 261-266https://doi.org/10.1093/qjmed/hcs221
        • Seymour CW
        • Liu VX
        • Iwashyna TJ
        • et al.
        Assessment of Clinical Criteria for Sepsis: For the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3) [published correction appears in JAMA. 2016 May 24-31;315(20):2237].
        JAMA. 2016; 315: 762-774https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.0288
        • Lambden S
        • Laterre PF
        • Levy MM
        • Francois B.
        The SOFA score-development, utility and challenges of accurate assessment in clinical trials.
        Crit Care. 2019; 23 (Published 2019 Nov 27): 374https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-019-2663-7
        • Tallgren M
        • Bäcklund M
        • Hynninen M.
        Accuracy of Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scoring in clinical practice.
        Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2009; 53: 39-45https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-6576.2008.01825.x
        • Moreno R
        • Vincent JL
        • Matos R
        • et al.
        The use of maximum SOFA score to quantify organ dysfunction/failure in intensive care. Results of a prospective, multicentre study. Working Group on Sepsis related Problems of the ESICM.
        Intensive Care Med. 1999; 25: 686-696https://doi.org/10.1007/s001340050931
      1. de Grooth HJ, Geenen IL, Girbes AR, Vincent JL, Parienti JJ, Oudemans-van Straaten HM. SOFA and mortality endpoints in randomized controlled trials: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis. Crit Care. 2017;21(1):38. Published 2017 Feb 24. doi:10.1186/s13054-017-1609-1.

        • Karakike E
        • Kyriazopoulou E
        • Tsangaris I
        • Routsi C
        • Vincent JL
        • Giamarellos-Bourboulis EJ.
        The early change of SOFA score as a prognostic marker of 28-day sepsis mortality: analysis through a derivation and a validation cohort.
        Crit Care. 2019; 23 (Published 2019 Nov 29): 387https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-019-2665-5
        • Valik JK
        • Ward L
        • Tanushi H
        • et al.
        Validation of automated sepsis surveillance based on the Sepsis-3 clinical criteria against physician record review in a general hospital population: observational study using electronic health records data [published online ahead of print, 2020 Feb 6].
        BMJ Qual Saf. 2020; (bmjqs-2019-010123)https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2019-010123
        • Fleischmann C
        • Scherag A
        • Adhikari NK
        • et al.
        Assessment of Global Incidence and Mortality of Hospital-treated Sepsis. Current Estimates and Limitations.
        Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2016 Feb 1; 193 (PMID: 26414292): 259-272https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201504-0781OC