Gender distribution in boards of internal medicine societies and paper authorship: Networking is the key to success

Published:January 08, 2022DOI:
      Networking is about building long-term relationships as well as a good reputation over time. Active professional networking is vital to career growth as it involves meeting people who you can support and who can potentially help you in return. Good networking can mean the difference between a “mediocre and a great career”. In several fields, the earlier networking starts, the better it is for the long-term progression of individuals. Sallie Krawcheck has well described this concept when she wrote that “networking is the No. 1 unwritten rule of success”. She was head of Bank of America's Global Wealth and Investment Management division and has been called the most powerful woman on Wall Street. She was also named one of Time's Global Influentials in 2002 and Fortune's Most Influential Person Under the Age of 40 in 2003. Krawcheck left Bank of America in 2011 and is currently the CEO and co-founder of Ellevest, a digital financial advisor for women launched in 2016.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to European Journal of Internal Medicine
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Vincent J.L.
        • et al.
        Addressing gender imbalance in intensive care.
        Crit Care. 2021; 25: 147
        • Ryser B.
        • Ravioli S.
        • Lindner G.
        Gender distribution in boards of internal medicine societies.
        Eur J Intern Med. 2021; 90: 122-124
        • Sebo P.
        • Clair C.
        Gender gap in authorship: a study of 44,000 articles published in 100 high-impact general medical journals.
        Eur J Intern Med. 2021;
        • Kritek P.B.
        • Hargraves M.
        • Cuellar E.H.
        • et al.
        Eliminating health disparities among minority women: a report on conference workshop process and outcome.
        Am J Pub Health. 2002; 92: 580-587
        • Committee on Maximizing the Potential of Women in Academic Science and Engineering; Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy; National Academy of Sciences; National Academy of Engineering; Institute of Medicine
        Beyond biases and barriers: fulfilling the potential of women in academic science and engineering.
        The National Academies, Washington, D.C2007
        • Parson Leigh J.
        • Grood C.
        • Ahmed S.B.
        • et al.
        Towards gender equity in critical care medicine: a qualitative study of perceived drivers, implications, and strategies.
        Crit Care Med. 2019; 47: 286-291
        • Metaxa V.
        Is this (still) a man's world?.
        Crit Care. 2013; 17: 112
        • Merman E.
        • Pincus D.
        • Bell C.
        • et al.
        Differences in clinical practice guideline authorship by gender.
        Lancet. 2018; 392: 1626-1628
        • Janssen K.T.
        • Urbach H.M.
        • Ham K.R.
        • et al.
        The gender gap in critical care task force participation.
        Lancet Resp Med. 2019; 7: 556-567
        • Mehta S.
        • Burns K.E.A.
        • Machado F.R.
        • et al.
        Gender parity in critical care medicine.
        AJRCCM. 2017; 196: 425-427

      Linked Article